Thursday, November 14, 2013

“The Art of Effective Communication”

     We take communicating for granted because we do it everyday, but how many times have you run into a problem because there was a break in communication?  I am sure the answer is more than once and we have all been on each side of the communication or error in communication. Communication all depends on the clarity of the presentation, from a simple conversation to a presentation.
     In viewing the email communication, the email that was sent was very professional, business friendly and to the point. The email pointed out the importance of getting the information and even contacting Jane about the matter. The use of bold letters reinforced the urgency and importance of the getting the information in a timely manner.       
     The voicemail was very similar to the email communication, although the message contained a very calm voice. The message was very professional and business minded. The voice message contained directions as well as why the information was needed along with an understanding that Mark has been unavailable and in possible meetings. This message was almost soothing which was encouraging because Mark was not having the “finger” pointed at him for not getting the information to Jane, but an understanding why he could be delayed in getting her the data.
     The face-to-face appeared very similar to the other messages. This communication seems to have more apathy then the importance of the information. The facial expressions were friendly yet professional, keeping a smile while asking for a task to be completed as quickly as possible while seeking understanding or her on Mark’s part to comply
      Looking at three different modes of communication, it is important that the message is clear and professional, Portny, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, & Kramer, “Communication can be formal or informal, written or verbal.  Whatever form communications take, however, project managers should plan and prepare so their message are received and correctly interpreted by project audience” (Portny, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, & Kramer, 2008). The type of communication is based on the people you are communicating with; if it is your peers the communication can contain jargon and be lighted hearted and joking. Whereas communication with your peers within a business environment is going to be professional, no jargon, it can be light hearted but a sense of professionalism. Proper communication is the key to success especially when it comes to completing a project on time and successful.
References
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (n.d.). The art of effective communication. [Multimedia program].
Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E.



1 comment:

  1. Kari, wasn't it interesting to review the same message three times? I agree that all three were done professionally; however, I had an issue with the face-to-face communication. Jane was standing outside Mark's cubicle and had her arms crossed, so I actually thought she was a little annoyed with him. I mean, she can't do her work unless he does his, so I actually found the face-to-face message to be the most threatening of them all. I guess that goes back to planning and being prepared so the audience can receive the message well. I think Jane should have practiced her delivery a bit more. After all, she did emphasize MY work so that was another cue to me that she was annoyed with Mark. Maybe I'm being too sensitive, but that's one big difference I found. Interesting to read your interpretation, Kari! It just goes to show that everyone will react differently, right?
    Cheers,
    Lesley

    ReplyDelete